Andrew Huberman· PhD
So try and see at a distance, because it's good for your eyesight. It'll keep this lens nice and elastic, and the muscles nice and strong that move the lens, and it has this relaxing component to it.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So try and see at a distance, because it's good for your eyesight. It'll keep this lens nice and elastic, and the muscles nice and strong that move the lens, and it has this relaxing component to it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, one way is to make sure that you spend at least 10 minutes a day total, at least viewing things off in the distance. So, that would be well over half a mile or more. Try and see a horizon. Try and get your vision out to a location that's beyond the four walls of your house or apartment uh or the doors of your car and the windshield of your car. I know that can be hard to do, but it's very valuable. So, try and see at a distance because it's good for your eyesight. It'll keep this lens nice and elastic and the muscles nice and strong that move the lens. And it has this relaxing component to it.