The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I do like technology you would think that by now 2023 that someone would have some Dy that you could drop on the sperm and go well like like that one has a lot of DNA fragmentation and that one doesn't know right there should be better ways to choose which sperm
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the DNA fragmentation in pretty much every cell to buy like the cell is always repairing its DNA so when visually selecting a sperm for E for ixie it's it's based on morphology shape and motility right you can't see the DNA damage inside the head of the sperm or the DNA itself
The Studies have shown that people who have abnormal DNA sperm fragmentation should do ixie
I mean yeah I wish right that's sort of the Holy Grail because I think he pointed out sort of a variant of right the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is that we can't if we identify which sperm is bad we're necessarily going to destroy it so to tell you know which one is harboring these mutations um would be great but I think we're not there yet