Andrew Huberman· PhD
So, there's been a move sometimes between the diagnosis over time.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So, there's been a move sometimes between the diagnosis over time.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think it's a function of several things um it doesn't help that the definition has changed over time so literally the DSM diagnostic criteria have
it doesn't help that the definition has changed over time so literally the DSM diagnostic criteria have changed over time and so for that not surprising the prevalence has changed over time in a good way the there is greater recognition and diagnosis