Andrew Huberman· PhD
Back to my worm studies I was doing, I would elevate heat shock proteins in these worms, and it would totally correct the problem, where they would no longer become paralyzed. They'd move around like they were young.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Back to my worm studies I was doing, I would elevate heat shock proteins in these worms, and it would totally correct the problem, where they would no longer become paralyzed. They'd move around like they were young.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
he there's a lot of animal studies that have been done. I did a lot of studies in worms like many many years ago where you can take amalloid beta 42 inject it into a worm muscle tissue and then activate heat shock proteins and it like prevents the aggregation and it prevents the the muscle sort of paralysis that occurs in these worms.
Heat shock proteins: 1) Prevent proteins from aggregating and forming plaques in the brain & vascular system 2) Mitigate muscle atrophy