Andrew Huberman· PhD
lead with questions and then as soon as the person responds, give them space to tell more.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
lead with questions and then as soon as the person responds, give them space to tell more.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Uh I would encourage people to lead with questions. Draw the other person out often. If you can get them talking about something that's important to them or connected to what you want, then you can engage in that conversation.
I would encourage people to lead with questions. Draw the other person out.