Andrew Huberman· PhD
the the prior notion of course was that once nerve cells in the brain die they don't regenerate and for a long time it was thought you don't produce any any new nerve cells any new stem cells in the brain um
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the the prior notion of course was that once nerve cells in the brain die they don't regenerate and for a long time it was thought you don't produce any any new nerve cells any new stem cells in the brain um
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we know that stem cells do form in the adult brain that's not controversial anymore we know that other circuits can take over for circuits that were dead