Andrew Huberman· PhD
Indeed, it is fair to say that movement is the feedback signal to the brain that helps keep it alive & able to self-modify.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Indeed, it is fair to say that movement is the feedback signal to the brain that helps keep it alive & able to self-modify.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's something about the requirement for movement that signals to the brain that it needs to continue to exist and not just the motor portions of the brain and that it or the portions of the brain controlling motor activity, but that the body may supply chemical or other types of feedback to the brain that if if it's moving and continues to move that the brain needs to continue to be robust