The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
frame rate is set by where you're looking the further out you're looking the larger the longer sort of time bins your capturing bigger time bins okay less resolution closer in and the more you're trying to predict the next outcome sort of fine grain analysis predicting what we call dpos duration path and outcome what's going to happen for how long and what's going to happen is something that you're thinking about and wondering about then frame rate goes up
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.