Andrew Huberman· PhD
It is very normal, I should say, it's very common for young children, babies to have an eye, with strabismus, that either deviates out or that deviates in. It is important to correct that.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
It is very normal, I should say, it's very common for young children, babies to have an eye, with strabismus, that either deviates out or that deviates in. It is important to correct that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
It is very common for young children, babies, to have an eye that um with strabismas that either deviates out or that deviates in. It is important to correct that if you would like to have balanced vision between the two eyes and for the brain to respond equally to the two eyes and to have I would say highfidelity quality vision.