Paul Saladino· MD
the Homo genus has been eating animals with neu5gc for three million plus years does it make any sense this would be a problem for us no
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the Homo genus has been eating animals with neu5gc for three million plus years does it make any sense this would be a problem for us no
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
why would something why would a cyalic acid present in meat and organs the very few foods very foods that made us human be bad for us that is the framework that we should approach this from when we do that we see all of these other pieces of literature that say oh yeah new 5gc is probably not harmful for humans at all