We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I would challenge any of these pundits in the space to really show me evidence that animal protein directly leads to cancer that is just not true and as we talked about in this podcast it is really based on faulty evidence generally on ad libitum which is over feeding essentially it means the mice can eat as much as they want they over feed in addition to other junk in their diet and then it gets attributed the protein
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.