Paul Saladino· MD
And they’re associated with hormone disruption, cancers, and others.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
And they’re associated with hormone disruption, cancers, and others.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so I've told you guys in the past that I'm not a fan of synthetic clothing polyesters Lululemon with forever chemicals like pfas especially Lululemon leggings and other companies with pfas in the crotch region especially if you're a woman who's not wearing underwear could absorb a lot of that and get into your body
women often don't wear underwear and I mean the vagina's very absorbent area and you have the crotch region of many of these leggings is coated with extra amounts of these sort of moisture resistance substances like pfas paraph floro alal substances and that can get absorbed in the human body it could get absorbed from our skin it could get absorbed from the mucous membranes of our of our genitals it's just a bad thing to have on your body
you've got leggings that are made from polyester which isn't a great thing because it's a synthetic plastic clothing
These chemicals are horrible for us and they're in our clothing, especially the crotch region of these leggings where you're not wearing underwear. They're getting into your body and they're staying there.