Bryan Johnson· Author
Step 1: Identify the source of death Step 2. Create a quantified die score Step 3: Build systems to methodically lessen die
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Step 1: Identify the source of death Step 2. Create a quantified die score Step 3: Build systems to methodically lessen die
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we're trying to do 78 Oregon biological age measurement age measurement and the Rejuvenation and we rely extensively on scientific back protocols and peer review Publications
so basically you think about it in two ways one is there's slowing the rate of your aging and then there's reversing the age that has occurred and we're working on both
right now I think what's within our power is to slow our speed of aging and try to reverse the aging damage that has happened and do so in a systematic way with biomarkers measured scientific interventions uh implemented and then measurement again to see if it has the effect
over the last 3 years I've spent millions of dollars on a protocol to slow my speed of aging and even reverse the damage that's taken place
over the past few years I think we've built the world's best anti-aging protocol now the secret to Our Success has been data getting your base on measurements allow you to assess where you're out in life and then it's the fun game of trying to improve yourself incrementally