Andrew Huberman· PhD
after a few hours not only they get close to each other but they recapitulate the circuitry in the dish literally they form like two brains in a dish right like it's the gut and the Brain in a dish
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
after a few hours not only they get close to each other but they recapitulate the circuitry in the dish literally they form like two brains in a dish right like it's the gut and the Brain in a dish
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.