Bryan Johnson· Author
curing all cancer would only add 3.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
curing all cancer would only add 3.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you abolish cancer in people nobody ever gets cancer again human lifespan goes up by only three percent
if you consider a typical 50 year old woman in the united states and you say you know what would happen if we had a cure to all cancers right every type of cancer we had a cure today and we implemented that life expectancy for a typical 50 year old woman in the in the united states would go up about three years
you know there's of all the things that you can do like if you prevent cancer you really only save about two years of your life
if you had a cure for cancer in people no one over the age of 50 ever got cancer again median lifespan of humans would go up by 3%