Andrew Huberman· PhD
introduction of the Gap somehow allows whatever we just learned to be encoded far more than if we don't introduce a gap which is exactly what you just said but with a bunch of nerdy Neuroscience speak to it
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
introduction of the Gap somehow allows whatever we just learned to be encoded far more than if we don't introduce a gap which is exactly what you just said but with a bunch of nerdy Neuroscience speak to it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so these Gap effects are are a real neurobiological phenomenon there's no question about it