David Sinclair· PhD
Men and Women are different species when it comes to longevity treatments.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Men and Women are different species when it comes to longevity treatments.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now the limitation of course because it's humans is that we're kind of stuck with doing that in blood and we don't know if the same thing might be going on in the brain or the liver although again i guess from autopsy studies we could probably figure that out now but we do have the tools now to do a lot of this we could do muscle biopsies is it the same in the blood and the muscle that's a possibility um so you know my feeling is that we have yet to really explore these sex differences in any depth and that we may end up having somewhat different therapeutics in women and men once we start looking into exactly how these things work out between the sexes