Bryan Johnson· Author
The study is in mice; earlier examples show that life-extension effects do not necessarily translate to humans, rapamycin being one of the most prominent examples.
Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
The study is in mice; earlier examples show that life-extension effects do not necessarily translate to humans, rapamycin being one of the most prominent examples.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
whether the same things that will prolong or shorten life in terms of macronutrient composition in mice will do the same thing in humans is unclear
what would really prolong life in humans is unclear whether the same things that will prolong or shorten life in terms of macron neutron composition in mice will do the same thing in humans is unclear
it is a very very long way from assuming that it's going to be the same in people most things that clinically work in mice do not work in people