Andrew Huberman· PhD
And then once inside those cells, it's able to interact with and change the confirmation of different proteins and accelerate or slow down different cellular reactions.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And then once inside those cells, it's able to interact with and change the confirmation of different proteins and accelerate or slow down different cellular reactions.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
What I'm trying to do here is paint a picture of the biology of water, understanding that when you ingest water, drinking it down, or when you breathe water vapors in the steam room or on a humid day, that water is entering your system, it's accessing your cells through these two mechanisms, diffusion across cell membranes or movement through aquaporin channels. And then once inside those cells, it's able to interact with and change the confirmation of different proteins and accelerate or slow down different cellular reactions. Everything from normal metabolism to blood pressure to damaged cells, depending on a number of different features of that water, as well as what the cells happen to be doing at any given moment.