Andrew Huberman· PhD
so again is it because a person is storing extra fat you know and their love handles that that's driving their risk of cancer no that that's those are just two things that are coming along for the ride
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so again is it because a person is storing extra fat you know and their love handles that that's driving their risk of cancer no that that's those are just two things that are coming along for the ride
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.