The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the computational capacity that the human brain has to make these predictions is just vast compared to these and these mice are already doing amazing things right so when you think about then what is the human brain able to do in terms of anticipating changes in nutritional State and how information that you're given can change uh uh uh the expected physiologic outcomes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.