Andrew Huberman· PhD
We don't have to give high energies. We don't have to give long exposures. We can improve situations but where we need to put our effort is the efficacy of how we improve things.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We don't have to give high energies. We don't have to give long exposures. We can improve situations but where we need to put our effort is the efficacy of how we improve things.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But it can't do it if that disease has really got its teeth into you. >> Right? So where we need to get into situations is early on in disease.