Andrew Huberman· PhD
I do think magnesium is important in there as well. I mean, I think, you know, again, about 40% of the US population doesn't get enough magnesium.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I do think magnesium is important in there as well. I mean, I think, you know, again, about 40% of the US population doesn't get enough magnesium.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
our daily magnesium requirements again based on our gender and our physical activity >> it's a range it's a sliding scale so you know women 300 350 milligrams a day men 350 400 milligrams a day really depending on how physically active you are
~45% of the US population has insufficient magnesium intake.
half the country doesn't even meet the RDA.
However, almost 50% of the US population has inadequate magnesium intake.
around 45% of the u.s. population does not meet the adequate intake for magnesium which is currently set around 350 to 400 milligrams a day and athletes can require up to 10 and 15 percent even more than that