The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now we're bringing curiosity and yes, we we want to learn from patterns and and learn from all the knowledge we have of the world but we're taking that and saying hey, none of that actually means anything until it's directed towards me if I'm the person reflecting about myself or if it's a helping process, we're helping a friend or or you know, we're in a therapy process.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So if we have the prompts to look at ourselves now, what we're doing is we're making it real. We're asking the right questions of ourselves to think oh what how do I function? What does work well for me? You know, how do I think of myself? How do others think of me? Am I introverted or extroverted? Am I combination of both? Do I sometimes feel in one state and sometimes in another? Is it working for me, right? Is it working for me in the big picture? Are there parts of the small picture that work for me or things I really don't like or things where I really don't feel uncomfortable? Now we're bringing curiosity and yes, we we