Andrew Huberman· PhD
then we know that they're defense mechanisms and that they're present that they're acting in us right we can't just see them because they're unconscious but if we start thinking about them we can learn about them right
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
then we know that they're defense mechanisms and that they're present that they're acting in us right we can't just see them because they're unconscious but if we start thinking about them we can learn about them right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Because even though they're unconscious, we can reflect on them, bring them to consciousness, and then bring ourselves to bear to make ourselves healthier.