Andrew Huberman· PhD
If we were to be looking directly at one another, that, it turns out, signals the next step, which is that it's very likely that we will each both look away.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If we were to be looking directly at one another, that, it turns out, signals the next step, which is that it's very likely that we will each both look away.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
"Rather than maximizing shared attention, good conversation may require shifts in and out of shared states accompanied by eye contact".