Andrew Huberman· PhD
So, we did a randomized trial at children's hospital. They either got training in self-hypnosis.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, we did a randomized trial at children's hospital. They either got training in self-hypnosis.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So yes, it can be very effective for children.
We did a randomized trial. I have a publication in pediatrics and the paper was children having to undergo avoiding systo urethrograms. So I would meet with them and the mother the week before. We find out from the kids where they like to be and I'd say, "You're going to play a trick on your doctors. Your body's there. You're somewhere else. Go visit your friend. Go to Disneyland. Do something else." And the mother would work on this with me at the head of the table. And we found that these children were much easier to image 17 minutes shorter procedures. And that's a long 17 minutes for for a little kid. So it can be very effective with children. They're less anxious, they have less pain, and uh get through these difficult procedures very well.