We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
cities are over developed with concrete and right angles and a lack of trees and bushes and grass and horizons so you know you look at the research on time and nature and it is overwhelming that humans thrive through exposure to nature and there's you know different doses seem to have different effects but we know that like being out of nature improves your mental and physical health people's blood pressure goes down things like that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.