The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's a theory of emotional development that I find particularly interesting which is from Allan Shore at UCLA that talks about how most of our testing of bonds and relationships is this seawing back and forth between very dopaminergic so driven by dopamine or serotonergic driven by serotonin States
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
this kind of seawing back and forth between the different reward systems seems to be the basis from which healthy emotional bonds are created