The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So what it makes me think is I wonder how much of that you're really choosing. Right? Or how much of that is is intentional or how much of that is just a reflex? The behaviors that in their life, how much of it they're choosing or how or they're reporting? No, the the behaviors. How much of what they're reporting? Like how much of that are you really choosing? Right? How much of that is what you want to be doing? How much of that is working for you?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.