The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
social contact is either positive or negative when it's deficient or in excess which is I think what you're describing as is social homeostasis is that right when we talked about the quality and quantity — there's just in terms of contact just amount of contact there's such a thing as just the right amount there's some thing is too little there's such a thing as too much there's overcrowding right it doesn't matter who it can be your family it could
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.