Andrew Huberman· PhD
And the amount of the physiological response, I should say that the amplitude of the physiological becomes progressively diminished with each retelling.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And the amount of the physiological response, I should say that the amplitude of the physiological becomes progressively diminished with each retelling.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's a tremendous anxiety response, sometimes even as great or greater than the actual exposure to the fearful event or trauma.
But what's remarkable is that in the second and the third and the fourth retelling of these traumatic or fearful events that anxiety response and the the amount of the physiological response, I should say the the amplitude of the physiological response becomes progressively diminished with each retelling.