The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in clinical studies they're exploring set and setting — as maybe the factors that have in the past historically given very unpredictable outcomes for psychedelic therapies — it's possible that it's set and setting it's also possible that there's individual variability it's possible that there are biomarkers that can predict which individuals would be well suited for this type of therapy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.