Andrew Huberman· PhD
I feel like anger and numbing out are the two most dangerous things.
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I feel like anger and numbing out are the two most dangerous things.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I mean, again, if people want to drink a little bit, I'm not going to disparage that. It's not good for you, but some people can have a couple drinks a week or whatever. Okay, not judging there. But things like alcohol, like certain forms of social media. And I say certain forms, because I do think social media can be informative and educational in the right context, and in the right amount. Certain forms of media more generally, the news, right? Any number of highly processed, highly palatable foods-