The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that judgmental part you've got such an attitude about or fear of uh if you were get just to begin getting curious about it and getting to know it a bit you'd find out that it's very valuable part that has a lot of discernment like you said you know and wanted wants desperately to keep you from getting in these relationships where you get hurt
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
as you've been listening to our conversation I'm speaking to listeners uh you may be thinking about some of your own Parts particularly your own protectors and if you can't think of any most people have a kind of critic inside or part that makes them work too hard or a part that uh uh takes care of too many people so I'm going to invite you to pick a protective part to try to get to know for a few minutes