The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, he's saying, "Hey, you can sort of pre-program a bias into you towards the positive." And it's not a false bias. Those memories that are up on his wall are real, right? And whether he's looking at them or he's just kind of glancing and he walks by and there's a registration inside, you know, that he that he's not even aware of, right? He's he is priming the unconscious mind to to see the positive side of things.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.