The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a phenomenon she discovered called social homeostasis which is our sense that we are experiencing enough not enough or just enough social interaction irrespective of whether or not we are an introvert or an extrovert
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but this notion of social homeostasis is I think so key uh important enough that I think we probably want to redefine it um as many times or restate it rather as many times as it's necessary because I believe what you're describing is the same thing that one would experience with food if we eat a lot we're consuming I know 3500 calories a day and then um suddenly we only have access to 1,800 calories a day there's it feels like a deficit because indeed it is whereas after some period of time at 1,800 calories a day 2200 calories a day feels like relative abundance relative abundance
social homeostasis I think is a term that if people haven't already stamped into their mind they should be stamping into their mind and and Dr K Tai deserves credit for that