Andrew Huberman· PhD
Yeah, and I think that's why word of mouth is important, right? If someone you trust tells you, hey, this is a good person that says a lot,
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Yeah, and I think that's why word of mouth is important, right? If someone you trust tells you, hey, this is a good person that says a lot,
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Yeah, and I think that's why word of mouth is important, right? If someone you trust tells you, hey, this is a good person that says a lot, right? It already makes the pretest probability, is quite high. But yes, it's interesting to see when like people have a therapist or they called their insurance and they're assigned a therapist. This thought that like, oh, that's the person I have to have now. And it's like, no, you should look at that like anyone you'd be interviewing, right, for a job, right?
So, people should perhaps try a few therapists and maybe have a session or two or three to see if they the rapport feels like it's taking root.
how do you say look I'm going to give this three or four sessions to determine if this is a good use in my time