The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if I were to have you focus on that racist voice in there we would have to get a lot of the parts that are ashamed of it to step out and then I would have you get curious about it rather than ashamed of it and ask it about where it picked up this these beliefs and it could tell you and then I would ask do you like having to carry This Racist stuff usually they say no if it's it's unloaded we can just unload it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.