Paul Saladino· MD
linoleic acid 1.93 percent one point six nine percent that's probably in my opinion at this point in ancestral level of linoleic acid in our diet when we go much above that we're gonna cause metabolic problems I believe
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
linoleic acid 1.93 percent one point six nine percent that's probably in my opinion at this point in ancestral level of linoleic acid in our diet when we go much above that we're gonna cause metabolic problems I believe
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there may not be a huge difference between five and ten it's like once you cross the threshold over which the human body can't really process this this linoleic acid and these seed oils there appear to be metabolic problems at a lot of levels
as westernized humans were at 12 13 14 of linoleic acid and as I've spoken about in my sort of educational stuff in the past there's probably a threshold cross which there isn't really a clear you know problem with more seed oils but once you cross the threshold and we see this in lab animals once lab animals have more than five or six percent of linoleic acid in their diet they start to really go downhill fast