We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
So the idea of metabolic flexibility is that our body can re react to whatever fuel is available, right? So we can oxidize the fuel based off of fuel availability. And so that requires a lot of cross talk between the body and metabolic disorders are really a function of this metabolic inflexibility, but we want to make sure we don't cause that by completely removing one of the metabolic substrates, which is glucose, carbohydrates.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So if our body now is inflexible to using glucose and it takes three days to retrain it how to use glucose, that concerns me a little bit.
to me this indicates metabolic inflexibility which is it's not the goal of any of this so if our body now is inflexible to using glucose and it takes three days to retrain it how to use glucose that concerns me a little bit