The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the body does not want lots of glucose floating around in the bloodstream because it can literally independently cause endothelial dysfunction which is basically blood vessel problems it can cause oxidative stress in the bloodstream it can cause glycation which is sugar literally just sticking to things
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
glycation itself is a way to um irreversibly alter a molecule and eliminate its utility. And indeed at the same time when you form an advanced glycation end product, it becomes a a substrate for or a molecule that can b a lian for rage the receptor for advanced glycation end products. And when rage gets activated you have a lot of inflammation. So the glycation goes beyond the altered structure of the molecule itself leading into some chronic subclinical inflammation.