The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there's a paper that i've talked about multiple times suggesting that only 12 of the us population i think based on a 2016 survey is free from any of the markers of metabolic syndrome therefore 88 of the population has at least one indicator of metabolic unhealth
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I would say that according to this study from looking at the NHANES study from 2009 to 2016 87.8% of the people surveyed had at least one feature of the metabolic syndrome.
Only 12.2% of people in the population surveyed in that study were metabolically healthy, did not have one of those metrics.
now we think 87.8 percent of our comrades perhaps those of us listening to this podcast are on the diabetes train
I just showed you data that 90 plus percent of the United States is metabolically unhealthy