Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
the microbiome is such a black box man yeah do you remember that like what was that big lawsuit um where that lady claimed to make this like magic black box and you could put your blood in and it would show you oh yeah or whatever like dude the microbiome is the microbiome is such a black box sorry it's such a black box um when people say like oh this changes the microbiome and it's good or bad i'm like i have no idea what that means for the microbiome
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so i don't think we understand the microbiome well enough to clearly say like yes no like these are good microbiome changes bad microbiome changes in general