But those muscles that you do build up on Metformin, have the same strength and have much lower inflammation and other markers of aging. You just won't have that extra 5% size of muscles.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
But those muscles that you do build up on Metformin, have the same strength and have much lower inflammation and other markers of aging. You just won't have that extra 5% size of muscles.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Metformin prevents muscle gain
but actually if you look at the data and there's been a couple of human studies, Metformin doesn't make a big difference to muscle size. It probably makes a difference if you're trying to win Mr. Universe. But other than that the difference is really slight. If you look at the graphs it's only a 5% difference, and actually 5% difference, I'll give up 5% body size for longevity any day. But the other important thing is that those muscles on Metformin were just as strong as the others and had less inflammation.
you could certainly see i think in the master's trial you saw and and near i'd love for you to talk about this trial a bit some blunting of of hypertrophy so muscle mass though i don't think they looked at muscle function so maybe it wasn't having any impact on on muscle function