The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
when we use LEDs, the light found in LEDs, when we use them, certainly we use them on on the retiny looking at mice, we can watch the mitochondria gently go downhill. They're far less responsive. They their membrane potentials are coming down. The mitochondria are not breathing very well. Can watch that in real time >> under LED lighting.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the blue light exposure um and you know I think 450 maybe 470 nanometers was was the peak of it it damaged mitochondria like they they died at a higher rate and the amount of mitochondria per cell went down drastically from this isolated blue light exposure and you know reactive oxygen species were were through the roof the you know membrane potential the mitochondria was was you know far reduced