Andrew Huberman· PhD
an effective stretching protocol can take as little as 5 minutes per day.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
an effective stretching protocol can take as little as 5 minutes per day.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
It really does appear that getting at least five minutes per week total of stretching for a given muscle group is important for creating meaningful,
And we can further divide those categories into which are the ones that are going to be most effective for increasing range of motion in the long-term, not just in one individual session. And there have been a number of studies exploring this. I can list out at least four, and we'll put those four as a kind of a cluster under one heading in the show note captions that arrive at essentially the same answer, which is that for increasing limb range of motion, it does appear that static type, including PNF, but static-type stretching is going to be more effective than dynamic and ballistic stretching.
getting at least five minutes per week total of stretching for a given muscle group is important for creating meaningful, lasting changes in limb range of motion.