The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The DNA of your cells, including these muscle cells are under strong circadian regulation. Each one has a pattern of gene expression that is different at different times during the 24 hour cycle, this is an unescapable reality of all cells in your body, right from your hair cells to your brain cells, to your retinal cells, to your toe on both feet. These cells make a gene called, BMAL, BMAL, B-M-A-L is a clock gene.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And indeed it was absent. In other words, the effect of increased protein synthesis early in the day was eliminated in the absence of the BMAL gene.