Andrew Huberman· PhD
The data on napping support the idea that naps are net positive for productivity.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
The data on napping support the idea that naps are net positive for productivity.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
What @NASA learned about the value of short naps for human performance in space has valuable applicability for those of us here on earth.
what they found was that these naps produced almost a 20% boost in short naaps 20% boost in their alertness and almost a 50% boost in their task productivity
What we've also found is that naps of as little as 17 minutes can have some quite potent effects on, for example, learning. None of this is novel. NASA pioneered this back in the 1990s. And during the missions, they were experimenting with NAPS for their astronauts. And what they found was that naps of little as 26 minutes improved um uh mission performance by 34% and improved daytime alertness by 50%.