Andrew Huberman· PhD
Sometimes we like to use a 90 minute window so that the participant can have a full cycle of sleep, and therefore they get both non REM and REM sleep within that time period.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Sometimes we like to use a 90 minute window so that the participant can have a full cycle of sleep, and therefore they get both non REM and REM sleep within that time period.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
or 90 min for a full cycle.